<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposition 12 Will Support Veterans in California With CalVet Mortgages</title>
	<link>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/</link>
	<description>Up to Date Rate Info and More &#124; California Current</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zachery Pulcher</title>
		<link>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-98832</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachery Pulcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-98832</guid>
		<description>I must say, as a great deal as I liked studying what you had to say, I couldnt support but shed curiosity soon after a while. Its as if you had a fantastic grasp on the issue matter, but you forgot to contain your readers. Probably you should think about this from significantly much more than a single angle. Or it's possible you shouldnt generalise so considerably. Its much better if you feel about what other people may possibly have to say as an alternative of just heading for a gut response to the subject. Believe about adjusting your individual thought method and providing other folks who could study this the reward of the doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, as a great deal as I liked studying what you had to say, I couldnt support but shed curiosity soon after a while. Its as if you had a fantastic grasp on the issue matter, but you forgot to contain your readers. Probably you should think about this from significantly much more than a single angle. Or it&#8217;s possible you shouldnt generalise so considerably. Its much better if you feel about what other people may possibly have to say as an alternative of just heading for a gut response to the subject. Believe about adjusting your individual thought method and providing other folks who could study this the reward of the doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Note that active duty personnel can also apply for Cal-Vet loans, if they are state residents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that active duty personnel can also apply for Cal-Vet loans, if they are state residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>There’s not really much of an argument against this. The state legislature voted unanimous for it and the democratic and republican parties both support it. The opposing view written in the official state ballot is from an attorney that has a thing for writing opposing positions on ballot measures.

Historically, California voters have approved every CAL-VET Bond Acts (all 26 from 1922 to 2000).

I’m supporting this proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s not really much of an argument against this. The state legislature voted unanimous for it and the democratic and republican parties both support it. The opposing view written in the official state ballot is from an attorney that has a thing for writing opposing positions on ballot measures.</p>
<p>Historically, California voters have approved every CAL-VET Bond Acts (all 26 from 1922 to 2000).</p>
<p>I’m supporting this proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.californiamortgagerate.com/californiacurrent/proposition-12-will-support-veterans-in-california-through-calvet/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>These things always pass, and are always pretty small. It's a decent program, and the bond has passed something like 20 times over the last 100 years.  It likely will again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These things always pass, and are always pretty small. It&#8217;s a decent program, and the bond has passed something like 20 times over the last 100 years.  It likely will again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

